By Amanda Reiman | Published in Huffington PostThe policy of prohibition is more dangerous than the plant prohibited. If our society cares about our kids, wouldn’t we protect them from dangerous policies that can negatively impact their lives for decades?
When Michael Saffioti’s mother suggested that he turn himself in to the Lynnwood Police Department for missing a court date related to a minor marijuana violation, surely she thought the 22 year old would get a slap on the wrist.
She could not have imagined that her son would not return from the police station.
Twenty two year old Saffioti struggled with a potentially fatal dairy allergy, experiencing great levels of anxiety associated with the constant threat of a reaction.
To calm his anxieties, he was using medical marijuana. Although living in Washington, which allows the use of marijuana for medical purposes, Saffioti did not have a recommendation from his doctor.
After a few brushes with the law over his marijuana use, Saffioti missed a court date, and went to the police station, with his mother, medical records in hand to resolve the issue.
But, after one night at Snohomish County Jail, Saffioti was dead after being served a lethal meal of oatmeal containing dairy. Even more disturbing, Saffioti told the guards he was having a reaction and they did not believe him, leaving him to die a slow death in his cell.
What is happening here?
The rhetoric that we are being fed by the government would have you believe that drugs are prohibited to protect the younger generation. But how can that be when the sanctions associated with the most commonly used illicit drug, marijuana, are creating more harm to young people then the drug itself ever could?
The death of Michael Saffioti is just the latest outcome in a disturbing trend that threatens the chances of success and opportunity for an entire generation of young people.
Zero tolerance drug policies in high schools, undercover officers soliciting marijuana from teens, and sanctions involving the removal of support for education and employment are forcing young people into a hopeless maze of stigma, poverty and the criminal justice system.
Many people are familiar with the Trayvon Martin case, in which a young, unarmed man was shot and killed by a community member on neighborhood watch.
What many people do not know is that Martin was in that neighborhood visiting his father because he had been suspended from his previous high school in Miami for a baggie with “marijuana residue” on it.
The school district’s zero tolerance policy found this grounds to suspend him from the school.
With Zero tolerance policies, any amount of drug for any reason, or even drug residue, can result in a suspension or expulsion, no questions asked. Many would argue that young people involved in drug use need greater attention from the educational system, not to be tossed aside.
This was the case for Josh Anderson.
In 2009, the 17 year old Virginia high school student had been caught twice possessing marijuana on school property. The first time he was expelled from one school and enrolled in another.
After his second offense, the day before a hearing to determine his fate, Josh committed suicide rather than face the hearing. Perhaps in an effort to make things cut and dry for administrators, the complexities of adolescence, drug use and emotional stability were lost.
But it’s not just inadequate care in our criminal justice system or the emotional fragility of adolescence that is putting these young people at risk.
Indeed, the government is playing their part to ensure that young people get entangled in the criminal justice system before they are old enough to drink by sending young, attractive undercover cops into high schools to solicit marijuana from students.
In Florida, an 18 year old honor student faces a felony marijuana charge for giving an undercover cop $25 worth of marijuana.
In Massachusetts, a student received a 2 year jail sentence for selling one joint to an undercover cop.
Why are we criminalizing these young people before their lives have even begun? How do we, as a society, benefit from creating a population of people under the age of 25 with felony records and interactions with the criminal justice system, all while creating sanctions that greatly reduce their chance of success as adults?
Currently, In 28 states, a student who is convicted of possessing any amount of marijuana will be denied federal financial aid for college for a year, and may also be denied state educational aid for a year or longer.
But, there is a silver lining to this cloud as states are beginning to recognize the dangers that drug prohibition itself poses to young people.
Good Samaritan legislation, which absolves those calling 911 to report a drug overdose from criminal prosecution, may have saved the life of Stephanie Bongiovi, Jon Bon Jovi’s daughter after she recently overdosed on heroin.
The call to 911 to report her overdose did not result in criminal charges, it did result in a life saved.
And, a recent report from the Center on Juvenile & Criminal Justice found that, as a result of marijuana decriminalization in California, simple marijuana possession arrests of California juveniles fell from 14,991 in 2010 to 5,831 in 2011, a 61 percent difference.
The authors of the study concluded, “Arrests for youths for the largest single drug category, marijuana, fell by 9,000 to a level not seen since before the 1980s implementation of the ‘war on drugs’.”
Those who continue to support marijuana prohibition are fond of saying, please think of the children.
Weighing the younger generation down with the burden of arrest, criminal records, stigma and financial struggle is a greater risk to the health of the entire nation, than the drug of marijuana could ever be.
Amanda Reiman PhD MSW is the Policy Manager of California for the Drug Policy Alliance