9,000 in Prison for Drug Possession at Cost of $450 Million a Year – Advocates UrgeĀ CaliforniaĀ to Focus on Resolving Crisis, Including Ending Prison as Response to Drug Use
Published by The Drug Policy Alliance
The United States Supreme Court ruled today inĀ Brown, et al. v. Plata, that the unconstitutional conditions of Californiaās prisons were caused primarily by overcrowding and orderedĀ CaliforniaĀ to reduce its prison population from over 200% of design capacity to 137.5% of capacity within two years.
āThe U.S. Supreme Court was right to uphold the order to reduceĀ Californiaās prison population. Tough on crime policies have crowded prisons so severely with people convicted of nonviolent offenses, including drug possession, that they are not only unsafe and overly costly, but also a net negative for public safety,ā saidĀ Theshia Naidoo, staff attorney for the Drug Policy Alliance.
āTo end prison overcrowding,Ā CaliforniaĀ must reserve prison for serious offenses and that requires sentencing reform,ā continued Naidoo. āEven minor changes to sentencing laws could reap major rewards. By reducing the penalty for drug possession from a felony to a misdemeanor, for example, the state would save $450 million a year and reduce the prison population by over 9,000. We urgeĀ CaliforniaĀ to take the logical step of ending incarceration as a response to drug possession, while expanding opportunities for drug treatment in the community,ā continued Naidoo.